CenSAMM Symposia Series 2017
Inside the Big Top at the Panacea Charitable Trust gardens, Bedford, United Kingdom
Violence has been envisaged and perpetrated by, and upon, millenarian movements for as long as they have existed. This symposium explores the motivations, causes, consequences and effects of violence for contemporary and historical millenarian movements.
Keynote Speakers
Susan J. Palmer
Susan J. Palmer is a sociologist of religion who lives in Montreal, Quebec. She is an Affiliate professor at Concordia University in Montreal and a Research Fellow and Member of the Religious Studies Faculty at McGill University. Her research in the field of new religions has been funded by Canada’s Social Science and the Humanities Research Council. She has published eleven books/edited volumes, notably Moon Sisters, Krishna Mothers, Rajneesh Lovers (Syracuse, 1994); The New Heretics of France (Oxford University Press, 2011); Aliens Adored: Rael’s UFO Religion (Rutgers, 2004). Her most recent, co-authored with Stuart Wright, is Storming Zion: Government Raids on Religions (Oxford University Press, 2015).
Stuart A. Wright
Stuart A. Wright is Professor of Sociology and Chair of the Department of Sociology, Social Work and Criminal Justice at Lamar. He is a former NIMH Research Fellow (Yale) and Rockefeller Foundation Scholar (Bellagio, Italy). He has authored over fifty publications in scholarly books and journals. Dr. Wright is known internationally for his research on religious and political movements, conflict and violence. He has published six books, including Storming Zion: Governments Raids on Religious Communities (with Susan J. Palmer, Oxford, 2015), Saints under Siege: The Texas State Raid on the Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints (with James T. Richardson, New York University Press, 2011), Patriots, Politics, and the Oklahoma City Bombing (Cambridge University Press, 2007), and Armageddon in Waco (University of Chicago Press, 1995).
Robert Gleave
Robert Gleave is Professor of Arabic Studies, Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies at the University of Exeter. His areas of research focus are Islamic law and legal theory, with a particular emphasis on the role of messianism in the history of Shi'i Jurisprudence. He is director of the Islamic Reformulations project, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, which aims to map and understand the transition from classical to contemporary Islamic thought. He is author of Islam and Literalism: Literal Meaning and Interpretation in Islamic Legal Theory (Edinburgh, 2012) and co-editor of Violence in Islamic Thought: from the Qur'an to the Mongols (Edinburgh, 2014).
Christopher Rowland
Discussant Comments and Roundtable Chair Christopher Rowland retired in 2014 as Dean Ireland’s Professor of the Exegesis of Holy Scripture at the University of Oxford, after teaching at the Universities of Newcastle upon Tyne and Cambridge. He has written on apocalypticism, Christian radicalism and, most recently, on William Blake and the Bible.
- Schedule
- Thursday April 6th
- Friday 7th April
CenSAMM Symposia Series 2017 Centre for the Critical Study of Apocalyptic and Millenarian Movements
Violence and Millenarian Movements
Violence has been envisaged and perpetrated by, and upon, millenarian movements for as long as they have existed. This symposium explores the motivations, causes, consequences and effects of violence for contemporary and historical millenarian movements.
Under the Big Top in the Panacea Museum Gardens, 9 Newnham Road, Bedford MK40 3NX. Email: simonrobinson@panaceatrust.org Tel: 01234 269430
CenSAMM Film Festival April 4-5th 2017, Panacea Museum, 9 Newnham Road, Bedford MK40 3NX
Violence and Millenarian Movements Curated and presented by David G. Robertson
This two-day event presents a series of popular films drawing from millennial movements and their apparent connection to violence. Highlighting both traditional and alternative religious movements, the selections highlight a number of recurring themes: environmental concerns; familial and societal breakdown; prophecy; ancient “wisdom”; conspiracy theories.
The films will be introduced by Dr David G. Robertson of the Open University and the Religious Studies Project, and the floor will be open to comment and discussion following each film.
April 4th 5.00pm - Noah (Darren Aronofsky, 2014), Left Behind (Vic Armstrong, 2014)
The first pair of films are firmly rooted in the Judaeo-Christian heritage, from which much (though by no means all) of millenarian ideas have their roots. Noah develops an early apocalyptic narrative which has its origins in Mesopotamia 3000 or more years ago, was incorporated into the earliest sections of the Torah and remains known to every Western schoolchild even today. Aronofsky’s version draws heavily upon apocryphal and mystical literature, as well as emphasising the brutality and violence of the tale. Notably, an environmental subtext is also present. Left Behind on the other hand is a very modern Christian millennial tale, drawing primarily from United States’ dispensational Protestantism. Unusually, the violence is the inevitable result of an absence of Christians, and it also includes a conspiracist narrative about the emergence of the antichrist as leader of the post-Christian European Union, a common feature of contemporary Christian millenarianism - and increasingly, mainstream politics.
April 5th 5.00pm - The Last Wave (Peter Weir, 1977), 2012 (Roland Emmerich, 2009)
The second pairing look at millenarianism from indigenous and secular traditions. Peter Weir, who made a number of films drawing on alternative religion, directed The Last Wave in which a homicide, unusual weather (note the environmental subtext again) and aboriginal shamanism are interwoven into an unusual apocalyptic narrative. 2012, one of a number of apocalyptic films from Emmerich, draws ostensibly on Mayan mythology, but the then popular 2012 millennial narrative draws in fact more on New Age traditions. This is in fact supported by the films underlying theme of cooperation and forgiveness against rigid institutionalism, and the violence emerges both from the natural disaster and from the panicked response by those in charge. Interestingly, Woody Harrelson’s conspiracy theorist character is a cliché, yet interestingly turns out to be correct.
Day 1, CenSAMM Symposium, Violence and Millenarian Movements.
9.00 – 9.30 Registration and coffee
9.30 – 9.40 Welcome
9.40 – 10.40 Keynote presentation: Stuart A. Wright, Professor of Sociology and Chair of the Department of Sociology, Social Work and Criminal Justice, Lamar University, USA.
Factors to Consider in the Trajectory of Violence in Millenarian Movements.
10.40 – 11.00 Coffee break
11.00 – 11.30
Garry W Trompf, Emeritus Professor in the History of Ideas, University of Sydney, Australia. (Via Skype)
Violence and Melanesian Cargo Cults
So-called cargo cults in the southwest Pacific region of Melanesia (from West Papua to western Fiji) are often classified as one form of millenarian movement. While debates about the extent of overlap aside, it is well known that collective indigenous energies yearning for and actively seeking European-style or internationally marketed goods ('the Cargo') can result in violent action. Desperation at being deprived of access to the new (and mysterious) wares, and outrage over reactive governments (mainly colonial ones) that try to put down group ritual attempts to bring on 'the Coming of the Cargo,' can incur physically violent outbursts. Accounting for the region's extraordinary cultural complexity, this paper discusses the various projections of the Cargo's arrival as commonly millenarian in character, and argues that the spilling over into violence of such movements of high expectation is very contextual, depending on the degrees of 'pacification,' on cargo cult leaders' assessments as to whether violence will produce anything beneficial, and on the raising of hopes that an activist group might be able to get around difficulties posed by superior government fire-power. The paper will discuss a spectrum of violent acts, from those more ritualized (but nonetheless formidable) to the formation of some kind of army ready to fight (albeit unrealistically and with expectations of harnessing extraordinary spiritual power). Any simple correlation between a greater extravagance of dreams and the high readiness to prepare for violent uprising will be questioned. The extent of the influence of 'Christian mission talk' is an important variable in Melanesian cargo (cult) movements, because hopes for a drastic eschatological-looking change involving the Return of Christ, the Second Coming or the last Judgement may demand that seriously irruptive solutions be left to God, not to armed men.
11.30 – 12.00
Justin Meggitt, Senior Lecturer in the Critical Study of Religion, University of Cambridge.
Apocalyptic Terrorism: Unveiling a Contested Concept.
Although a staple of much literature in terrorism studies since the seminal article of David Rapoport (1984), the validity of the concept 'religious terrorism' has been the subject of considerable controversy in recent years (e.g. Gunning and Jackson, 2011), something that has coincided with the increasing salience of the concept in popular and governmental discourse.
However, one aspect of this debate that has received limited attention is the degree to which 'religion' is often used as synonym for 'apocalyptic' in key critical literature in terrorism studies. For example, 'religious terrorism' is often distinguished from other kinds of terrorism as the violence it employs is allegedly unconstrained by the usual moral or strategic constraints, a characteristic it owes to the assumption that its actors are engaged in a cosmic conflict with transcendent, rather than this-worldly, aims (Juergensmeyer 2003, pp.149–150). Its perpetrators are often seen as especially relentless and brutal in comparison with other kinds of terrorists, not least in their willingness to use weapons of mass destruction; as Magnus Ranstorp (1996) puts it, they are ‘relatively unconstrained in the lethality and the indiscriminate nature of violence used’ because they lack ‘any moral constraints in the use of violence’ (p. 54). The paper will analyse the history, veracity and utility of such ways thinking about 'religious terrorism' and the interpretative value of apocalyptic tropes that are regularly associated with its critical analysis.
1.00 Lunch
1.00 – 2.00 Keynote presentation: Susan J. Palmer, Affiliate Professor, Concordia University & Research Associate, McGill University, Montreal.
Millennial Children and the Potential for Violence in Contemporary New Religious Movements.
2.00 – 2.30
Ariel Hessayon, Senior Lecturer in History, Goldsmiths, University of London.
The Fifth Monarchists and Thomas Venner's rebellion of 1661
The biblical book of Daniel is set in ancient Babylon at the time of Kings Nebuchadnezzar and Belshazzar, although it was actually written much later in the mid-second century before Christ. Parts of it relate various dreams and visions concerning a statue made of different materials and four great beasts. Taken together they were usually interpreted as four world empires: (1) Babylon; (2) the Medes and Persians; (3) Greece; (4) Rome. All would be destroyed, after which there would be a fifth monarchy ruled by King Jesus.
It was from Daniel that the millenarian movement the Fifth Monarchists derived their name. Since they were not an organised religious community like the Baptists or Quakers it’s difficult to date their precise beginnings. But winter 1651 – shortly after Oliver Cromwell had defeated the enemies of the new republic in Ireland, Scotland and England – seems about right. Certainly by 1653 the press was full of accounts about Fifth Monarchists meeting at several London locations. Thereafter the movement spread, particularly in southern England. Outside the capital support was concentrated in Suffolk, Norfolk, Devon, Cornwall and North Wales. Yet even allowing for exaggerated reports at the height of their popularity there were probably less than 10,000 Fifth Monarchists.
In this paper I want to explore the infamous rising led by the Fifth Monarchist Thomas Venner in January 1661 against the restored Stuart monarchy. According to Samuel Pepys their battle cry had been ‘The King Jesus, and the [regicides’] heads upon the gate’. And the result was bloody skirmishes on London's streets with dozens of fatalities. Afterwards, the surviving ringleaders (including Venner) were publicly hung, drawn and quartered. Their heads were set on London Bridge and their dismembered bodies on four of the city’s gates. King Jesus had not come.
2.30 – 3.00
Aiden Cottrell-Boyce, PhD Candidate, Divinity, University of Cambridge.
Prophecy Failure and Violence: The Vennerite Rebellion
At the heart of the Fifth-Monarchist belief system was the conviction that history was providential, and that providential history had profited and - thereby - vindicated the Good Old Cause. The seemingly miraculous victories at Naseby attested to this. Fifth-Monarchists believed that the beheading of Charles I was an indication that the process of establishing the Fifth-Monarchy of King Jesus was already inexorably progressing.
The restoration of Charles II, therefore, represented a failure of prophecy. Many who had once advanced the Fifth-Monarchist standard reviewed and rejected their commitment to Fifth-Monarchist prophecy.
However, in light of the research of Festinger, Riecken, Schachter, Zygmunt and Melton, we now know that many devotees do not simply integrate the failure of a prophecy, nor do they adapt their understanding of the world in response to new realities.
Thomas Venner and his band of Fifth-Monarchists conceded that the restoration was a baffling development in the story of God’s providential favor for Protestants. They were particularly baffled that this reversal had not taken place on the battlefield but rather as a result of ‘hellish contrivance.’ In all, the events of 1660 were, the anonymous author of the Door of Hope wrote “strange Providence, whereas most are confounded.”
It was clear to the Vennerites, however, that this setback was only temporary. They renewed their belief that a defeat for the Godly would be a defeat for God. As such it was impossible to countenance:
And if God should not appear for the poor Remnant of Jacob, but suffer them ... to fall before Papists, and Cavaliers… then what would become of his great Name?
They resolved to take up arms, in an ultimately fatal mission, to defend the fidelity of God’s promise to the new Israel.
Melton, in his writing on the social response to cognitive dissonance, claims that when prophecy fails:
some action must be taken to repair the social fabric torn in the prophecy’s failure. At such moment’s groups tend to turn inward… and engage in processes of group building.
In this paper, I contend that the radical and indeed suicidal commitment to Fifth-Monarchist prophecy adopted by the Vennerites functioned as a mode of cognitive dissonance reduction, a desperate attempt to repair the fabric, torn by the disaster of the restoration.
3.00 – 3.30 Break
3.30 – 4.00
Britta Gullin, Associate Professor (Retired), Religious Studies, Umeå University, Sweden. (Via Skype).
Violence in two millenarian movements. The process preceding the tragic ending.
On the 5th of October 1994 in Freiburg, Switzerland (later also in France and Canada) and on the 28th of February 1993 in Waco, Texas USA, serious events took place in which millenarian movements were involved. In a house in Freiburg, owned by members of the millenarian movement OTS (Ordre du Temple Solaire), the police found several dead bodies. When FBI and CIA on the 28th February, 1993 attacked the community belonging to the millenarian/apocalyptic movement Branch Davidians, their houses took fire and many members perished in the flames.
We don´t know in detail what really happened. Did the members commit suicide or were they murdered ? Whose fault was it that as many as 70 Branch Davidian members died in the flames?
I am not going to discuss who to blame or the results that came out of the investigations made by different authorities. Instead I will in my text focus on a few aspects in the process that preceded the tragic endings related to these two movements.
One decisive aspect is the relation between the - more or less - isolated communities where members lived - and the society outside. Many scientists emphasize the collaboration between the endogamous (such as ideology, leadership or organisation) and the exogamous aspects (such as the attitude among people outside). An escalating tension in the process is one important factor. But the two examples I will discuss show significant differences regarding;
*the period stretching from the time when the movements assumed a discernible form up to the time when the tragic events took place. For quite some time the members in Branch Davidians did not have any conflicts with the people outside the communities while the attitudes from people outside (especially members of their families), towards OTS quite soon expressed concern. I will discuss some possible reasons for the diversity.
*Leadership is another important aspect when it comes to millenarian violence. The members in Branch Davidians were under a very strong influence of their leader David Koresh. As a leader he, and he alone, had a strong influence on his members. The leadership in OTS was more flexible. There were two or three parallel leaders with different input at different times in the process. Can different kinds of leadership have an influence on the process?
*Exactely what in the message can possibly have contibuted to the escalating tension in the process and the tragic ending?
Many scientists emphasize that not one cause alone explains the millenarian violence reflected in these movements. In a complex collaboration between many aspects different steps can be discerned in the escalating process leading to the end. I will discuss this issue and illustrate my discussion with the two movements presented above.
4.00 – 4.30
Moojan Momen (unaffiliated)
The Progress towards Millenarian Violence: The Case of Babis of Iran
This article examines a case of millenarianism and violence that occurred in Iran just over 150 years ago. The Babi movement started as a millenarian sect claiming that the advent of the messianic figure, the Imam Mahdi, was at hand. Its founder, Sayyid `Ali Muhammad, who took the title, the Bab, at first appeared to claim to be just the intermediary for the Imam Mahdi, but later claimed to be the Imam Mahdi himself. The writings and actions of the Bab were provocative for the religious leaders of Iran, whose position he threatened, but there was nothing in them to suggest violence. Indeed, he specifically held back from calling for a jihad, which the Imam Mahdi was expected to do, according to the Islamic Traditions. Over a period of time, however, the Islamic clerics escalated matters, calling on the state to intervene to halt the spread of the movement. This led eventually to violent confrontations in three locations in Iran in 1848-1851 and then in 1852 to an attempt on the life of the Shah. I previously published a paper on the 1852 episode in Nova Religio (2008). This paper takes forward the analysis published there by looking at a broader range of events including the 1848-51 violence and describes the stages in the escalation of the conflict and specifically at those factors that increased the likelihood of violence.
4.30: Discussant comments and roundtable (depending on time) chair: Christopher Rowland, (retired in 2014 as Dean Ireland’s Professor of the Exegesis of Holy Scripture at the University of Oxford).
Sample questions for discussion:
What do we mean by ‘apocalyptic’ and ‘millenarian’? What is the relationship between ‘millenarianism’ and ‘messianism’?
Does ‘millenarianism usually lead to violence? If it doesn’t, what circumstances prevent it? Why does millenarianism endorse violence anyway?
Does the history of the Southcottian movement have anything to contribute to the understanding of disappointed eschatological hope?
5.00 Close / Delegates return to Hotel / Drinks.
7.00 Delegates’ dinner.
Day 2, CenSAMM Symposium, Violence and Millenarian Movements.
9.00 – 9.30 Registration and coffee.
9.30 – 9.40 Welcome
9.40 – 10.40
Keynote presentation: Rob Gleave, Professor of Arabic Studies, Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies, University of Exeter.
Islam, Messianism and Justified Violence. How Law and the End Times intersect in Muslim thought.
10.40 – 11.00 Break
11.00 – 11.30
Matthew Rowley, PhD candidate, History, University of Leicester.
From Children of Abraham to Seed of the Serpent: Changing Beliefs Concerning Native Americans Before and During King Philip’s War, 1620–1676.
Between 1620 and 1676, Puritan attitudes towards the Native Americans went through three main—though at times overlapping—phases: ambivalence, expectation, and disillusionment. As with other European colonies in the Americas, their beliefs were usually complex and tension-laden. The Pequot War (1636–1637) initially drove the English towards closer relations with their Native neighbours. By mid-century, many came to believe that the conversion of Algonquian Indians held special eschatological importance for New England and the world. By 1676, these hopes were dashed. As Puritans and Algonquians entered the prolonged and costly ‘King Philip’s War’, English beliefs took a decisive negative turn—with some even plotting the extermination of civilian Indian converts. This paper details these changing beliefs and evidences the relationship between perceived injustice, scriptural and eschatological reflection, and the justification of violence.
11.30- 12.00
Seb Rumsby, PhD Candidate, Politics and International Studies, Warwick University.
The Changing Dynamics of Millenarian Movements in the Ethnic Politics of South East Asia.
Millenarianism in South East Asia has generally been regarded by academics as a native reaction to the enormous social disruptions caused by colonial intrusion, doomed to failure and at best a step on the way to more ‘modern’ forms of collective social resistance. However, contrary to predictions that it would die out with the advance of nationalism, millenarianism has both pre-dated and outlasted colonialism, and continues to feature prominently in ethnic politics to this day. An analysis of past and present Hmong millenarian movements shows how the progressions from pan-ethnic to mono-ethnic, and violent to peaceful, reflect historical trends of ethnicization and territorialisation in South East Asia. It is equally important to consider how and why millenarian activity is remembered and interpreted by different participants and onlookers, as highlighted by the varying portrayals of recent events in Northern Vietnam gathered from online reports and interviews. Millenarian movements have played an important role in voicing social discontent, challenging power structures and moulding ethnic relations in South East Asia and will continue to do so, but they need to be examined and understood in their new socio-political contexts.
1.00 Lunch
1.30
David G Robertson, Religious Studies, Open University.
Pizzagate and the Luciferian Agenda.
In November and December 2016, online accusations of a paedophile ring operating out of a Washington pizza restaurant led to the arrest of Edgar Welch (28) after threatening staff and firing several shots in an apparent attempt to liberate “child sex slaves”. This panic, known as pizzagate, began when leaked emails from Hillary Clinton’s aide, Mike Podesta, were suggested to contain coded language by a number of users on web forums, who began to elaborate upon the narrative until it was widely taken as evidence of a nationwide satanic paedophile ring involving numerous politicians and other power brokers. It is rare is for a conspiracy theory such as this to escalate into violence so quickly, but two things are of particular interest here. First, this ties into the satanic ritual abuse scare of the early 1990s - a phenomenon intimately tied to a Manichaean understanding of the world promoted by certain evangelical millennarian Christians. These ideas have been nurtured and promoted by high profile independent broadcasters such as Alex Jones, for whom they are part of a sweeping millennial narrative in which a global (and sometimes cosmic) cabal of Luciferians seek to decimate the world’s population and enslave the remains.
1.30 – 2.00
Andrew Fergus Wilson, Senior Lecturer in Sociology, University of Derby.
#whitegenocide and the Neo-Fascist Millennium: Understanding white supremacism as an apocalyptic movement.
There is a well established literature that identifies and outlines the important role that religious and spiritual beliefs play in the formation and maintenance of recent and current neo-fascist identities. A great deal of existing research details the use of conspiracy theory in white nationalist discourse (Barkun 1996, 2013; Gardell 2003; Dobratz & Shanks-Meile 2000; Goodrick-Clarke 2003; Lamy 1996) this paper will draw attention to the importance of recognising how this use of conspiracy theory is commingled with other forms of belief identified by Colin Campbell as contributing to ‘the cultic milieu’ (Campbell 1972) and Barkun described as ‘stigmatized knowledge’. Much recent white nationalism has been composed from the range of stigmatized knowledge Barkun describes as typifying ‘improvisational millennialism’ (Barkun 2013). The hollow Earth, extra-terrestrial spiritual dimension escape route employed by Hitler coupled with yoga cosmic conflict and conspiracy theory that is described in the Nazi millennialism of Miguel Serrano (Goodrick-Clarke 2003, Gardell 2003) coincides with many of the touchstones mentioned by Barkun. Similarly, the blending of strands of white nationalism with new religions, especially neo-paganisms (Goodrick-Clarke 2003; Gardell 2003; Shekhovtsov 2009; Wilson 2012) compound this tendency. This paper will argue that the emergence of white nationalist social media strategies such as ‘#whitegenocide’ signify a discourse that is more indebted to millennialism and violent apocalyptic traditions than straightforwardly political roots. In framing neo-fascist white nationalism in this way fresh ways of understanding and responding to it become available.
2.00 – 2.30
Rogelio Scott, Rovira i Virgili University, Spain. (Via Skype)
Carlos Raez, San Marcos National University, Peru.
Surviving the (Maoist) Apocalypse: Millenarian Responses to Political Violence by Two rural Congregations (Peru, 1980-2000).
During the Peruvian Internal Armed Conflict (1980-2000), rural neo-Judeo-Christian churches and charismatic congregations were targeted by the Shining Path (SP), a Maoist terrorist organization. The violence unfolded by the SP provoked armed responses by the churches and/or massive exodus to flee the violence. In both scenarios, accounting for the events in a coherent fashion became an almost impossible task, even under the churches’ traditional discourses. Therefore, several religious groups opted to adapt millenarian and apocalyptic discourses that both gave shape to the understanding of (what they perceived as) the end of times, and justified the actions they undertook. In this paper we compare two millenarian responses towards communist political violence. The first one comes from peasant neo-Pentecostal churches that undertook a military confrontation against the SP. They framed the situation as a sign of the end of times, and took SP militants as “armies of the Antichrist”. Pentecostal churches organized armed militias under the blessing of the Holy Spirit which –their narrative says- guaranteed their victory in the battlefield. After the demise of the SP, religious discourse became the main semiotic component to reorganize community life and power. The second case concerns the Israelites of the New Universal Pact (AEMINPU), a religious congregation of Peruvian origins that bases its faith in the Old Testament. The ‘Israelites’ were exposed to constant harassment by the SP due to their faith, but also due to the Israelites’ agrarian entrepreneurships and cooperatives, which were seen by the Maoists as ‘reactionary’, against the spirit of Revolution. Their narrative traces an exodus of the whole Israelite community. This flee from violence accounts their failed attempts to persuade the guerrilla to accept a truce. The comparison of both narratives will shed light on the different directions that millenarian movements can take after being confronted with apocalyptic scenarios.
2.30 – 3.00
Joseph Webster, Lecturer in Anthropology, Queen’s University Belfast.
Violent Endings
This paper examines dispensationalist imaginings of ‘the last of the last days’, with a particular focus on their acutely violent character. For the Brethren and for Jehovah’s Witnesses, the most convincing ‘signs’ of the imminent apocalypse are violent ones. By drawing on a mixture of biblical and extra-biblical tropes and images – flames, horns, bullets, missiles – dispensationalism creates a semiotic landscape filled with natural, supernatural, and ‘man-made’ disaster. By analysing different images of ‘violent endings’ in circulation among the Brethren and the Witnesses, this paper asks two questions, namely, what are the effects of such violent imaginings, and what imaginings exists on the other side of such violence, after its perpetration? Drawing inspiration from Rodney Needham’s work on dual symbolic classification, this paper argues that dispensationalist violence demands its own partial disappearance by setting itself against its symbolic opposite of millennial healing, only to then reappear in a final act of dichotomising violence through a ‘renovation of the earth by fire’.
3.00 – 3.30 Break
3.30: Discussant comments and roundtable chaired by Christopher Rowland (retired in 2014 as Dean Ireland’s Professor of the Exegesis of Holy Scripture at the University of Oxford).
Sample questions for discussion:
What do we mean by ‘apocalyptic’ and ‘millenarian’? What is the relationship between ‘millenarianism’ and ‘messianism’?
Does ‘millenarianism usually lead to violence? If it doesn’t, what circumstances prevent it? Why does millenarianism endorse violence anyway?
Does the history of the Southcottian movement have anything to contribute to the understanding of disappointed eschatological hope?
5.00 Finish.