CenSAMM
  • About
  • Blog
  • News & Events
  • Conferences
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Blog

'Alt+R vs. Ctrl_L and what Humanities and the Social Sciences can do about it' by Suzanne Newcombe

Category: Discussion

Tagged:

July 26, 2017


The concept of the Alt+R has become familiar with the ascendency of Donald Trump to the office of the President of the United States. The need for an alternative to the political and economic status quo is felt on all sides of political persuasions. What to do about this situation though, often appears harder to propose and even harder to agree upon. I will first describe the current ‘culture wars’ as a conflict between an Alt+R and a Ctrl+L – before arguing for the importance of teaching and using the methods of the Social Sciences and Humanities to navigate this environment.

The Alt+R is associated with abrasive ‘plain-talking’ populist ‘truths’ and cries of ‘fake news’ when facts are interpreted with  is seen to be the wrong conclusion. The Alt+R uses a variety of strategies to delegitimize and silence opposing political views, from promoting its own ‘trusted’ and ‘unbiased’ sources such as Breitbart, Fox News and Citizen’s United political ‘exposes’ to decrying critical news sources as ‘FAKE NEWS’, to blatant ad hominem  attacks, in the USA, against  figures like Senator Rand Paul, Hilary Clinton or Arianna Huffington.

 

While this vitriolic discourse is more intense on the other side of the pond, there are echoes of it in European politics with the  various populist movements from the English Defence League, UKIP, to France’s National Front to Greece’s Golden Dawn.   

Although the Alt+R has embraced this term as one of positive self-identity, one can also identify what I will term a “Ctr+L” - those self-identifying on the left  of the political spectrum who also attempt to silence opposition.  At times, traditional media sources have described the Alt+R’s message as unsubstantiated conspiracy theories, discrediting the message without examination of the evidence.  

University engagement in no-platforming and silencing of opposition through noisy protests and chants, removing the books of Holocaust deniers from open-access shelves, and an enforcement of ‘politically correct’ language, provides ammunition for the Alt+R’s impressions of the existence of a ‘liberal thought police’.  

The Ctr+L is not above riots and violence, as events surrounding schedule talks of (then) Breitbart News spokesperson Milo Yiannopoulos at California Universities UCLA, Davis and Berkeley during early 2017 and some G20 protests have shown.

Photograph of a burning police cruiser at the G20 protests in 2010 which turned violent in Toronto. Image by Mark Mozaz Wallis CC

So what can we, as educators, do in a time when (apparently) the ‘authority of experts’ is derided?  

We need to remember that the most important part of what we teach is PROCESS not content.

We don’t actually want our students to parrot our views, because we want our views to be challenged – with convincing evidence and logical consistency.  

Every citizen needs to have the  tools to inform themselves for public debate. Myself and my academic colleagues aim to do just that in our teaching. We want to empower our students to be able to become their own experts, and to accurately and critically evaluate the testimony of other ‘experts’.  We teach that the testimony of experts should be evaluated on the merits of evidence and not simply because of a qualification or job title. 

There is some evidence that people who have been trained  with only technical competencies and respect for authority - and not in the skills of rhetorical discernment needed in today’s information-saturated environment - might be more vulnerable to ‘radicalisation’ and even terrorism.

Beyond educating individuals in critical thinking skills, as academics and teachers, we need to model and support our students in learning how to dialogue with those who have views radically different from their own.

This kind or encounter can occur unexpectedly in internet forums, where many type out opinions that they would hesitate to speak to someone face-to-face. As moderators and educators we need help by discerning our students’ information from expressions of emotion, to promote dialogue and demonstrate empathy with all our students. Only when individuals feel recognized as humans are they open enough to consider evidence and arguments that might feel alien to their sense of identity.

In my field of study, that of minority religious movements, Megan Phelps-Roper has provided an excellent narrative of how to dialogue with and perhaps eventually change opposing views. Phelps-Roper grew up in the infamous Westboro Baptist Church, picketing funerals of homosexuals and fearing the hellfire and damnation that awaited everyone not part of her family’s church. But through a combination of empathy and debate, she grew to find her own mind. (See also her TED talk).

We need to empower our students to be able to find the own positions, and not be afraid of changing their opinions should evidence and argument warrant. There is no shame in revising erroneous views. This is something academics must model as well as promote in our students.

In this current period of ‘culture wars’ – teaching the methods of Social Sciences and Humanities as we do in Religious Studies at the Open University is more important than ever. How to evaluate, debate and re-assess our opinions that are the most important skills we are teaching.


Suzanne Newcombe is a Lecturer in Religious Studies at the Open University. She has a longstanding interest in contemporary millenarian and apocalyptic groups. She has researched new and minority religious movements at Inform, an independent charity based at the London School of Economics for over fourteen years. While working at Inform she produced, with her colleague Sarah Harvey, an edited book on Prophecy in the New Millennium and has appeared on BBC Radio 3's Material World discussing 2012 prophecies.


  • Share Share
  • Print Print

Categories

  • Reviews (9)
  • Discussion (39)
  • Artist in Residence (1)
  • Podcast (23)
  • Conference (31)
  • News (11)
  • Video (8)
  • CDAMM (3)
  • Book (1)
  • Journals (1)

Tags

1381 Uprising, A. L. Morton, Adam and Eve, All things in common, Andrew Perrin, anthropocene, Antichrist, Antisemitism, apocalypse, Apocalyptic language, apocalypticism, Ariel Hessayon, Armageddon, artificial intelligence, Bar, Barack Obama, BASR, Beth Singler, Bible, Bill McGuire, Black Hebrew Israelites, Black Sabbath, Blake, Blake, William, Bob Crow Brigade, Book of Daniel, Brahma Kumaris, Branch Davidians, Britta Gullin, Caligula, capitalism, Cargo Cults, CDAMM, children, Children of God, Christ, Christian, Christian origins, Christian Zionism, Christians United for Israel, Christina Petterson, Christopher Rowland, climate change, climate changs, Conspiracy, Coronavirus, COVID-19, Crossley, James, Damian Cyrocki, Damien Cyrocki, David G. Robertson, Demonology, Denver International Airport, Dictionary, Diggers, DK International, Donald Trump, Doukhobors, Dune,, Dune:, early modern history, Early C, Ecoovie, ecophobia, Encyclopedia, End times, English politics, English Revolution, envi, environmentalism, Erin Roberts, extinction, Family International, Felicja Kozłowska, Four Kingdoms, George W. Bush, Gerrard Winstanley, Gordon Brown, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, Gospels, Herb Berg, Hibbert Trust, Historical Jesus, Home Office, Immigration, indigenous, indiginous, Jack Holloway, James Crossley, Jan Maria Kowalski, jason king, JBSAR, Jeremy Corbyn, Jesus, JFK, John Bale, John Ball, John Ball,, John F. Kennedy Jr

Archive

  • May 2025 (1)
  • March 2025 (1)
  • January 2025 (2)
  • October 2024 (1)
  • June 2024 (1)
  • May 2024 (1)
  • March 2024 (1)
  • February 2024 (1)
  • January 2024 (1)
  • November 2023 (2)
  • October 2023 (1)
  • June 2023 (1)
  • May 2023 (4)
  • March 2023 (2)
  • February 2023 (1)
  • January 2023 (2)
  • December 2022 (1)
  • November 2022 (1)
  • October 2022 (1)
  • September 2022 (1)
  • June 2022 (2)
  • May 2022 (2)
  • April 2022 (2)
  • March 2022 (4)
  • February 2022 (4)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (3)
  • November 2021 (1)
  • October 2021 (1)
  • August 2021 (1)
  • July 2021 (2)
  • June 2021 (1)
  • May 2021 (1)
  • April 2021 (3)
  • March 2021 (2)
  • February 2021 (3)
  • January 2021 (1)
  • December 2020 (3)
  • October 2020 (1)
  • September 2020 (3)
  • August 2020 (1)
  • July 2020 (2)
  • June 2020 (1)
  • May 2020 (1)
  • April 2020 (3)
  • March 2020 (4)
  • February 2020 (1)
  • January 2020 (2)
  • December 2019 (2)
  • November 2019 (1)
  • October 2019 (1)
  • September 2019 (2)
  • August 2019 (1)
  • July 2019 (1)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • May 2019 (1)
  • April 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (2)
  • February 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (1)
CenSAMM

© CenSAMM
All rights reserved.

  • Sitemap
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies & Privacy Policy
  • Web Design by Chameleon
Contact Details

CenSAMM
Faculty of Divinity
University of Cambridge
West Road
Cambridge
CB3 9BS

Tel:

Explore CenSAMM
  • Conferences
  • Events
  • About
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • The Panacea Charitable Trust
  • The Panacea Museum
  • Faculty of Divinity, University of Cambridge
Newsletter Signup

Stay up to date with CenSAMM News and Information

  • Homepage
  • About
    • People
      • Prof. James Crossley
    • The Panacea Museum
    • The Panacea Charitable Trust
    • MF Norwegian School of Theology
    • FAQs
  • Blog
  • News & Events
  • Conferences
    • Anglo-Israelism and the British Imperial Imagination
    • Apocalyptic Nostalgia? Cold War Imagery in Popular Culture
    • The Next Quest for the Historical Jesus
    • The Study of Apocalyptic and Millenarian Movements Conference 2022
    • The Study of Apocalyptic and Millenarian Movements Conference 2021
    • Apocalypse and Utopia, 1914-1945
    • Video Games and Religion: Apocalypse and Utopia
    • Apocalypticism and Millenarian Movements in the Ancient World
    • Virtual Symposium: The Cold War and the End Times
    • The Study of Apocalyptic and Millenarian Movements Conference 2020
    • The Study of Apocalyptic and Millenarian Movements Conference 2019
    • Natural Disasters and the Apocalypse (1500 to Present) Sept 13, 2018
    • Apocalypse in Art: The Creative Unveiling (June 28 and 29, 2018)
      • Apocalypse in Art: The Creative Unveiling (June 2018) media archive
    • AI and Apocalypse (April 5 and 6, 2018)
      • AI and Apocalypse conference (April 2018) media archive
    • Archive 2017
  • Resources
    • Critical Dictionary of Apocalyptic and Millenarian Movements (CDAMM)
    • Online resources (open-access videos and podcasts)
      • Definitions and General Themes
      • Biblical, early Christian, and early Jewish millenarian and apocalyptic movements
        • Apocalypticism and related ideas in the Bible, early Judaism and early Christianity
        • Jesus and the Gospels
        • Paul
        • Book of Revelation
        • Gnosticism
      • Medieval
      • Reformation, early modern and nineteenth century
      • Twentieth century and contemporary
        • Waco, David Koresh and the Branch Davidians
      • Culture
      • AI
      • Environmental issues
    • Profiles of Millenarian & Apocalyptic Movements
      • Brahma Kumaris
      • Branch Davidians
      • Christian Zionism
      • Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
      • Environmental Millenarianism
      • ISIS
      • Neturei Karta
      • Peoples Temple
      • Plymouth Brethren Christian Church
      • Rastafari
      • Sadrist Movement
      • Standing Rock Sioux
      • Strauss-Howe Generational Theory
      • Survivalists
      • Technological Millenarianism
    • CenSAMM Videos on Apocalypticism and Millenarianism
    • CenSAMM Interviews, Roundtables, and Seminars
    • Movies & Books
  • Contact

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
Copy